The Supreme Court granted Trump’s immigration in the migrant expulsion case

On Thursday, the Supreme Court gave President Donald Trump a key immigration victory, paving the way for the expulsion of eight migrants from Djibouti to South Sudan, a country not listed in their original dismissal orders.

In a short unfinished opinion, the judges granted the request of the administration to “clarify” a previous decision, confirming that their suspension of June 23 of an injunction of the lower court also blocked a monitoring of monitoring reparation rendered on May 21.

This compensation order had forced the government to give an opinion to migrants and a chance to raise complaints under the Convention against torture Before being sent to a third country.

The Supreme Court is against migrants in the expulsion case

President Donald Trump participates in a press conference on recent Supreme Court decisions in the White House Information Salle on June 27, 2025 in Washington, DC (Joe Raedle / Getty Images)

“The request for clarification is granted,” wrote the court. “The repair order of May 21 can no longer be used to apply an injunction that our stay made inapplicable”.

The decision gives the Trump administration a green light to move forward with deportations of the third country under its decree, even towards not clarified destinations before in the dismissal documents approved by the court.

Earlier, a district judge had noted that the government had violated its April injunction by not providing a “significant opportunity” to six of the migrants to plead in the event of dismissal. The Supreme Court aroused this injunction in June, and Thursday’s clarifications clearly indicate that the monitoring order of the lower courtyard cannot bear.

Judge Sonia Sotomayor, joined by judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, brutally dissident, accusing the court of having allowed deportations that could lead to torture or death.

Rules of the Supreme Court on the deportations of the third country of Trump, in the major test for the president

Supreme Court facade (Valerie Plesch / Picture Alliance via Getty Images)

“Today’s ordinance clarifies only one thing: the other litigants must respect the rules, but the administration at the Supreme Court on speed numbering. Respectfully, I dissipate,” wrote Sotomayor.

“The government seeks to cancel (fundamental rights) by expelling non-citizens towards potentially dangerous countries without notice or the possibility of asserting a fear of torture.”

The decision strengthens the hand of the Trump administration when it applies its policy of expulsion to the third country.

The Department of Internal Security celebrated the decision, publishing a statement Thursday afternoon: “These patients will be in South Sudan by independence day,” said assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “A victory for the rule of law, the security and security of the American people.”

The eight individuals include violent offenders with convictions for murder, qualified flight, armed assault and sex crimes involving minors. Among them, Enrique Arias-Hierro, found guilty of homicide and armed robbery, Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Quinones, found guilty of attempted murder in the first degree; And Kyaw Mya and Nyo Myint, both recognized as guilty of serious sexual offenses involving minors or vulnerable victims.

The DHS called them “illegal criminals’ illegal criminals” abducted by ice under the executive authority of Trump.

The white house press secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on X concerning the decision, writing: “This is another incredible victory for America. Thank you to the Supreme Court for the decision on the side of the law and the order, and affirming the president’s executive authority.”

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

“Today’s decision clearly indicates that it is the judges of the district court that disturb the ordinances of the Supreme Court, not the Trump administration,” wrote David Warrington, wrote an email to Fox News Digital. “This decision is a clear reprimand of such a judicial exceeding.”