Woman accused of having threatened to kill Trump released by the federal judge appointed by Obama

A woman arrested last month for alleging death threats against President Donald Trump was released by a federal judge who clashed with the Trump administration on several occasions this year, in particular by trying to block the deportations of Venezuelan migrants under the law on extraterrestrial enemies.

Head judge James Boasberg ordered Nathalie Rose Jones, 50, released no later than August 27 under electronic surveillance and asked her to visit a psychiatrist in New York once she recovered her property from a local police station.

Boasberg’s order intervened after the American magistrate, judge Moxila Upadhyaya, ordered Jones to be held without surety and undergoes a skills assessment. She cited her “very disturbing conduct” of publications on social networks targeting the president, combined with the fact that she had then traveled in the District of Columbia, by Wusa9.

Nathalie Rose Jones, who was arrested last month for alleging death threats against former President Trump, appears in a selfie outside the White House (left). The chief judge of the American district James Boasberg (right) ordered his release in strict conditions on August 27, 2025. (Facebook; Getty Images, Valerie Plesch / Bloomberg via Getty)

Indiana’s wife faces federal charges for social networks to disintegrate Trump

Jones participated in a “worthy arrest ceremony” for Trump during a demonstration in Washington, DC, which went around the White House complex and was arrested following an investigation into his series of Instagram and Facebook publications.

In early August, Jones called Trump as a terrorist, qualified his administration as a dictatorship, and said Trump had caused a loss of life in extreme and unnecessary life compared to the coronavirus.

“I am ready to kill this potus sacrificially by unspeakable and cutting his trachea with Liz Cheney and all the affirmation present”, a post of August 6 led by the FBI states.

In a post of August 14 directed towards the Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Jones would have written: “Please organize the arrest and dismissal ceremony of Patus Trump as a terrorist on the American people from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the White House on Saturday August 16, 2025.”

The next day, Jones voluntarily accepted an interview with the secret services, during which she described Trump as “terrorist” and “Nazi”, said the authorities.

She said that if she had the opportunity, she would kill Trump to “composed” if she had to do it and that she had an “object to blade”, what she said was the weapon she would use to “realize her mission to kill” the president.

Following the demonstration in Washington, DC on August 16, Jones was again interviewed by the secret services, during which she admitted that she had threatened Trump during her interview the day before.

She was accused of threatening to kill, kidnap or seriously injure the president and send messages through the lines of the state that contained threats to kidnap or harm someone.

Nathalie Rose Jones, 50, was arrested last month for alleging death threats against former President Trump. A federal judge ordered his release under GPS surveillance on August 27, 2025. (Facebook)

Bondi Doj files a complaint alleging a fault by the federal judge James Boasberg

Upadhyaya expressed his concern about the severity of the threats of Jones and judged that they were serious enough to justify detention and provided a state conference and a preliminary hearing for September 2, the prosecutors required to obtain an indictment by September 15.

But the lawyers of Jones, who had argued that their client was armed and did not really want to follow the threats, appealed to the detention decision of Upadhyaya, and Boasberg canceled the detention order of Upadhyaya.

Fox News Digital contacted the Ministry of Justice to comment.

Boasberg, President of Barack Obama, appointed, found himself several times in the Trump administration reticle this year.

In March, he published a temporary prohibition order aimed at blocking the use by Trump of an immigration law of the era of the 1798, the law on extraterrestrial enemies, to summarize hundreds of Venezuelan nationals in El Salvador.

Boasberg ordered all planes to El Salvador to be “immediately” returned to us, which did not occur, and later ordered a new investigation to determine if the Trump administration had respected its orders.

In April, he judged that the court had procedural reasons for a possible outrage procedure, although this decision was suspended by a superior court of appeal, which has not yet examined the issue.

His ordinance of March 15 approached a complex legal saga which ultimately generated dozens of judicial disputes linked to the expulsion across the country – although that subject to Boasberg was the very first – and then prompted the Supreme Court to govern, on two separate occasions, that the injured moves had violated the protection of the regular procedure of migrants under the American Constitution.

Trump publicly attacked him as a “madman from the radical left” and called for his dismissal.

Boasberg clashed with the Trump administration several times this year. (Left: Yuri Gripas / Abaca / Bloomberg via Getty Images; right: Valerie Plesch / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

In July, the Attorney General Pam Bondi filed a fault complaint against Boasberg, accusing him of making inappropriate comments on the administration of President Trump, the chief judge Roberts and approximately two dozen federal judges – notes that she would have argued the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

Boasberg would have warned the judges he thought that the Trump administration “would ignore the decisions of the federal courts” and trigger “a constitutional crisis”.

“Although his comments were inappropriate even if they had a base, they were even worse because judge Boasberg had no foundation – the Trump administration has always complied with all the orders of the court,” said the complaint. “Judge Boasberg did not identify alleged violations of judicial orders to justify his unprecedented forecasts.”

Breanne Deppisch de Fox News and Louis Casiano contributed to this report.