The New Hampshire judge prohibits the injunction against the citizenship order of the birth of Trump

A federal judge of New Hampshire blocked the executive decree of President Donald Trump prohibiting the citizenship of regional duty and granted class certification status on Thursday to all infants affected by the ordinance.

US district judge Joseph Laplante said he would make a written decision at the end of the day, explaining his decision more. The injunction also shrinks the scope of the class to infants, removing parents from the case.

In his order, Laplante held that the deprivation of citizenship, as held by the 14th amendment, and the long -standing policy changes would create “irreparable damage”.

Trump to start applying the order of droit citizenship this month, says the doj

The United States Supreme Court building in Washington, DC (Nicolas Economicou / Nurphoto via Getty Images)

However, it is almost sure to be quickly called upon by the Trump administration. This comes after the Supreme Court examined the case earlier this year and ruled 6-3 in late June that the complainants requesting national compensation must file their affairs as a collective appeal – shrinking cases where the lower district courts can issue so -called universal injunctions.

This decision of the High Court has focused closely on the authority of the lower courts, and the judges did not launch themselves into the legality of Trump’s decree putting an end to the citizenship of the dawn, which was the legal pretext of the case.

However, officials of the Ministry of Justice told a federal judge last week that he planned to start applying the Trump -up of Citizenship Citizenship from July 27, in recognition of a 30 -day stay included in the The Supreme Court Declaim, showing that they plan to act quickly.

The order of Trump, signed on the first day of his second mandate of the White House, orders all American government agencies to refuse to issue documents of citizenship to children born of illegal immigrants, or who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or legal permanent resident.

The ninth circuit rejects Trump’s attempt to restore the order of droit citizenship

The Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks alongside President Donald Trump on the recent decisions of the Supreme Court in the White House Information Salle on June 27, 2025. (Joe Raedle / Getty Images)

The ordinance, signed by Trump on his first day of power, was immediately challenged in January by more than 22 American states of the States and the rights of immigrants, which argued that the effort aimed at putting an end to the citizenship of the right of birth was both unconstitutional and “unprecedented” and threatened more than 100 years of legal preceding.

It was almost immediately blocked by the lower courts, Before finally going to the Supreme Court for examination in May.

The High Court’s decision also discussed a burst of new ACLU proceedings and other defense groups for immigration defenders, who have re-depressed collective appeals in the federal courts of Maryland and New Hampshire, where Laplante examined the request on Thursday.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

Lawyers for the Trump administration stressed last week that the Supreme Court’s decision did not prevent him from taking other measures before this date, and said that she was planning to “immediately” start to develop and issue public councils on the order.

The defenders warned that possible repercussions of the order could prove to be “catastrophic”.