The Ministry of Justice degenerates the quarrel with the federal judge James Boasberg on misconduct

The Ministry of Justice accused the US District Judge James Boasberg of misconduct on Monday, degenerating the Trump administration’s long -standing quarrel against federal judges who have blocked or interrupted some of the president’s most radical priorities.

The complaint, examined by Fox News Digital, focuses on the remarks that Boasberg would have made at a meeting of March 11 of the United States Judicial Conference – the national organization for the development of policies for the federal courts, which meets twice a year and is led by Supreme Court Chief judge John Roberts.

During this meeting, according to the complaint, Boasberg “tried to influence the chief judge Roberts badly” and about two dozen federal judges during the conference by suggesting that the Trump administration could “ignore the decisions of the federal courts” and trigger “a constitutional crisis”.

The complaint was sent to the management of the American prosecutor Pam Bondi and signed by his chief of staff, Chad Mizelle.

The Court of Appeal blocks the expulsion flights of Trump’s administrator in the continuation of immigration of extraterrestrial enemies

The American prosecutor Pam Bondi speaks alongside President Donald Trump on the recent decisions of the Supreme Court in the White House Information Room on June 27, 2025 in Washington, DC (Joe Raedle / Getty Images)

Fox News Digital could not independently check the reported remarks of Boasberg at the meeting of March 11, and his office did not immediately respond to a request for comments.

The officials argued that the reported remarks were an attempt to prejudice or to influence in Roberts, and said that they “counted the integrity and impartiality of the federal judiciary”.

The complaint asked, not for the first time, that Boasberg be removed from the presidency of JGG c. Trump,, A trial brought in March by ACLU lawyers and others on behalf of the hundreds of immigrants who have been summarily expelled to the El Salvador prison under the auspices of an immigration law in wartime.

The complaint – and his request to withdraw Boasberg from the most consecutive immigration case of the second term of President Donald Trump – is certain to test the already heavy relationship between the administration and the courts.

Since the inauguration of Trump in January, senior administration officials have excrupted dozens of so-called “militant” judges who have blocked or interrupted some of Trump’s executive orders to take strength.

In particular, the pro-Trump legal group founded by the White House assistant, Stephen Miller, tried to continue Roberts earlier this year American judicial conference, Discussing in a long -standing legal offer that the actions of the group exceeded the framework of what they allege are the “fundamental functions” of the judiciary.

Boasberg, in particular, has become one of Trump’s greatest public enemies. On March 15, several days after pretending to have made the remarks included in the complaint of the DoJ, Boasberg issued a temporary ban order aimed at blocking the use by Trump of an immigration law of the era of war in 1798, the law on extraterrestrial enemies, summarily expel hundreds of poisonian nationals in El Salvador.

The group aligned by Trump continues the chief judge John Roberts to restrict the power of the courts

The White House advisor Stephen Miller, on the left, and the chief judge of the Supreme Court John Roberts. (Getty Images)

Boasberg ordered all planes to El Salvador to be “immediately” returned to us, which did not occur, and later ordered a new investigation to determine if the Trump administration had respected its orders. In April, he judged that the court had procedural reasons for a possible outrage procedure, although this decision was suspended by a superior court of appeal, which has not yet examined the issue.

His March 15 Order Touched Off A Complex Legal Saga that Ultimately spawned dozens of Deportation-Related Court Challenges across the country-Though the One Bitcht Before Boasberg was the very first-and Later prompt the Supreme Court to Rule, On Two Separate Occasions, That The Hurried Removals Had Vioated Migrants’ due process under protections under The American Constitution.

100 days of injunctions, tests and “teflon don”: Trump, second term, responds to his greatest tests in court

However, he also placed Boasberg squarely in the reticle of Trump officials – including the president – while the administration moved to release a decrees and target judges who tried to block them.

Their attacks focused closely on the behavior of several judges – but no one more than Boasberg, one appointed by Obama who was initially operated by the president of the time George W. Bush in 2002 to be an associate judge of the Superior Court of the Columbia District.

The White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has repeatedly used her podium this year to drag “leftist left judges”, accusing them of going beyond their authority and undergoing presidential powers.

Trump suggested earlier this year that Boasberg could be charged with his actions, describing the judge as a “troublemaker of troubles and agitators” – and causing a rare public reprimand of Judge Roberts.

For some, the complaint seems to be in good condition: Boasberg ordered the Ministry of Justice and the ACLU in the court a status hearing last week to determine the status of the 252 complainants of CECOT who were expelled in Venezuela at El Salvador as part of an exchange of prisoners with Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro.

Gorsuch, on the Roberts side with judges of the Supreme Left Court in the immigration decision

The ordinance of judge James Boasberg on March 15 caused a complex legal saga which caused dozens of proceedings linked to the expulsion nationwide. (Getty Images)

Boasberg put an end to the hearing by ordering the administration and the ACLU lawyers to submit a joint update of status in court on Thursday, August 7 and to continue to do so every two weeks thereafter, because it weighs the options that the court must order a compensation.

When asked during a status hearing before the court last week if the Ministry of Justice would comply with the orders of the court, the lawyer for the Doj Tiberi Davis said they would do it: “If it was a legal order”.

Davis added that the Doj would likely request an appeal to a higher court.

In particular, this is not the first time that the Trump administration has been trying to have Boasberg withdraw to supervise the case.

In March, the Ministry of Justice asked the DC Court of Appeals circuit to withdraw the Boasberg judge to preside over the law on extraterrestrial enemies and to have it reallocated to another federal judge. The Court of Appeal has never taken measures in response to the request.

Shelters, Jesus and Miss Pac-Man: the American judge Grillads Doj on trans politics in a vertiginous questioning line

The White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt talks to journalists during a press briefing. (Cell Gunes / Anadolu via Getty Images)

The White House has repeatedly argued that the judges of the lower courts like Boasberg should not have the power to block what he calls the legal agenda of the president – although the judges say that Trump’s actions violate the law.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

However, the first six months of Trump’s second term were marked by repeated judicial clashes, while the administration goes ahead with its agenda and targets those who stand on its way.

This feeling was taken up by the former interim director and the current border Tsar Tom Homan. “I don’t care what the judges think. I don’t care what the left thinks, “he said earlier this year in an interview.” We come. Another fight. Every day.”