The members of the House Freedom Caucus say that the Senate changes its misfortune for Trump’s tax bill
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The members of the Conservative House Freedom Caucus warn that they have serious problems with the version of the Senate of the “Big, Beau Bill” by President Donald Trump because he is currently written.
On Sunday, the GOP rebels group argued in a public statement that the Senate bill added $ 1.3 billion to the federal deficit, while the bill sentenced to the Chamber would increase the federal deficit by $ 72 billion.
“Even at no cost of interest, it is $ 651 billion on our agreed budgetary framework,” the statement said.
The Senate is currently working with the bill and is expected to end a little later on Monday or even Tuesday.
The Republicans of the Senate Ram Ram Trump “ Big Beau Bill ” from Ram Trump through the key test vote
House Freedom Caucus criticizes President Donald Trump’s tax bill. (Getty Images)
The Senate bill would add an additional 1 billion of dollars to increase the debt limit, compared to the version of the Chamber and permanently extend certain corporate tax reductions in the tax on tax reductions and jobs (TCJA) of President Donald Trump that the Chamber was only prolonging.
It also includes several specific new additions to mitigate the concerns of the Senate Republicans concerning the bill, including a rural hospital of $ 25 billion to compensate for problems with Medicaid cuts, and tax relief for whalers who seem to be for senator Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska.
The Senate operates under a mechanism called “current reference of politics”, which would actually be zero the cost of extending TCJA tax reductions by calculating them as de facto operational policy rather than calculating the cost as if they were not in place.
In the absence of action of the congress, TCJA tax reductions expired at the end of 2025.
DEM DELAY TACTIC ends, the debate begins on the “ great bill of Trump of Trump
The conservatives of the Chamber, however, warned that they had serious problems with the bill.
Representatives Ralph Norman, RS.C., and Eric Burlison, R -MO., The two members of the Freedom House caucus, said the bill could face steep chances – even to fail – in the lower chamber if changes had not been made.
The two said that he could fail in a procedural vote at the house level before the legislators could even face the measure itself. A rule vote is traditionally considered to allow a debate on legislation before the legislators weigh it.
“If it passes (the House Rules Committee), I do not think that survives on the ground in the current form in which it is. You know, we have told the senators that,” Norman told Fox News Digital. “They knew it from the start.”
President Donald Trump pushes the Republicans to pass his program (Alex Brandon / AP Photo)
Norman said President Mike Johnson, R-La., Had done a “good job”, but added the Senate, “they have fighters … But we just have to have certain things that respect our version of our house.”
However, the legislation could change before his arrival in the House, because the Senate worked by a parade of the amendments of the Democrats and the Republicans.
Burlison said it could depend on the fate of a Senator Rick Scott amendment, R-Fla., Who would significantly make Medicaid the financial burden for states that have expanded their Medicaid population under the Acting Acting Act (ACA).
The modification, if adopted, would bring back the current rate of 90% that the government pays for the expansion population of Medicaid thanks to the percentage of federal medical assistance (FMAP) at the rate of non-expansion, which oscillates as low as 50%.
Scott’s proposal could add hundreds of billion savings in terms of, in addition to a dollar billion, the Senate plan already saves in Medicaid spending.
“I do not see how the Senate will pass the room if (Rick Scott’s amendment) does not go at least. It will probably take more expense reductions than this, but that would make the majority there,” Burlison told Fox News Digital, without commenting on the leaders of the Gop of the Chamber.
He predicted that the bill could be “killed” in the vote of the rule on the scale of the chamber otherwise.
Indeed, several members of the Freedom House caucus led to X to publicly urge the Senate Republicans to approve the Scott amendment.
“All Republican senators should vote yes on” the very reasonable elimination of Senator Rick Scott from the FMAP amendment FMAP of Medicaid, “said representative Clay Higgins, R-la., Published.
Fox News Digital contacted the office of President Mike Johnson to comment on the comments of the members of the Caucus of the Freedom Caucus.
In particular, the main provisions originally in the bill of the Chamber were withdrawn from the legislation so as not to be “compliant with Byrd”.
The “Byrd Bath” is a process during the process of budgetary reconciliation in which the Senate parliamentarian, a non -partisan official and unadred responsible for advising the Senate policy, is hidden by the bill to find out if it adheres to the strict budgetary directives of the reconciliation process.
Republicans use the process of budget reconciliation to advance Trump’s agenda on taxes, border, energy, defense and debt limit via a single legislation.
Budget reconciliation allows Republicans to bypass any democratic opposition to adopt its bill by lowering the Senate threshold for the adoption of 60 votes to 51.
Representative Eric Burlison said some supports may depend on a Senator Rick Scott amendment. (Images Kevin Dietsch / Getty)
Click here to obtain the Fox News app
They aim to have a bill on Trump’s office by July 4.
A GOP assistant told Fox News Digital: “The Senate version contains more in the economies in accordance with Byrd than the Chamber, and correctly marks the current tax policy as neutral income – and assumes the type of growth which was also massively underestimated the last time.”
The assistant noted that the Blanche House’s economic advisers’ Council said that the bill would generate $ 4.1 billions of economic growth thanks to tax permanence, which is more than the version of the house.
The Senate Republicans argue that the bill would lead to $ 1.6 billion of expenditure discounts over 10 years – above the House Freedom Caucus asked for a threshold of $ 1.5 Billion of dollars.
