The Governor of Oregon rejects Bondi’s request to end the Protections of the Sanctuary

The Attorney General Pam Bondi received an answer this week from the governor of the first state to adopt “sanctuary” legislation, after warning that it was initiated in “policies and procedures which hamper the federal immigration application at the expense of the interests of the United States”.

Oregon governor Tina Kotek, a democrat, confirmed the reception of Bondi’s original letter of the previous week, reducing that she “was respectfully disagreement” with Bondi’s assertion.

“The state of Oregon, its civil servants and its law enforcement agents do not engage in conduct that thwarts the federal immigration application,” said Kotek, noting that the state of Beaver adopted the first law of the state of the American sanctuary in 1987.

The representative of the Rocky Barilla, D-Eugenne, presented the bill which was then signed by Governor Neil Goldschmidt, in the midst of concerns, the police wrongly profiled the Latinos on their immigration status.

Boston’s WU returns to Bondi, quoting the revolution, while other cities slam federations on the warnings of “sanctuary”

The Attorney General Pam Bondi, on the left; Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek, right (Reuters; Imagn)

In his response to Bondi, Kotek said that for almost 40 years, Oregon officials and the police had not violated the federal immigration law without being respecting state policy.

“A voting measure of 2018 to repeal parts of the Federal Oregon immigration application failed when 63% of Oregon voters opposed the repeal of existing law,” she said, adding that the 1987 law had been revisited and “strengthened” by Salem legislators in 2021.

Kotek cited the declaration of the Attorney General of Oregon Ellen Rosenblum after the actions of 2021:

“Oregon represents the security, dignity and human rights of all Oregonians,” said the state prosecutor at the time, while Kotek also echoes the affirmation that the State acts within the law due to a legal preceding to the tenth contemporary amendment called the anticomandering rule.

This rule, born of cases like New York c. US in 1992 – which focused on requests for provision of nuclear waste – prescribed that the federal government cannot force them to administer federal programs.

Trump Amin Cock Aclu to compare the Ice Center at the Japanese internment camp: disturbed and lazy

President Joe Biden, on the left; Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek, right (Reuters)

Kotek said in his letter to leap that she was aware of the warnings that the Trump administration could pursue civil actions against civil servants on the grounds that they hinder federal immigration efforts or facilitate the revolution.

“The State does not take additional expenses or burden on the federal immigration application because it is the work of the federal government,” continued Kotek, citing the anti -controlled rule.

“The state of Oregon is in accordance with federal law and will continue to respect the law of the state. Consequently, no” immediate initiative “is necessary to eliminate the laws which hamper the application of immigration,” she concluded, noting that her letter had been given to the Ministry of Justice via Federal Express.

The back and forth come as an Oregon judge on the point of deciding on a significant immigration case in the state, and to decide whether an agricultural worker of the Guatemalan twice may be released from the federal guard despite previous deportations.

President Joe Biden, on the left, and the Governor of Oregon, Tina Kotek, on the right, appreciate ice cream in a store in 2024. (Reuters)

Identified only as LJPL, the foreign national had been expelled during the Obama administration, and the litigants argued if he could be released as long as he carried out regular checks in an Eugene immigration office.

Judge Karin Immergut, one appointed by Trump that chief judge John Roberts also appointed to the FISA court, will decide if the ice can go ahead and expel immediately “LJPL”, according to Oregon Public Broadcasting.