The DoJ files a fault complaint against Judge Boasberg on Trump’s comments

The Ministry of Justice has filed an official complaint alleging a fault from the chief judge of the American district court James Boasberg. Fox News examined the complaint written by the chief of staff to the Attorney General Pam Bondi, Chad Mizelle, and sent to the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeal for the Columbia district circuit, Sri Srinivasan.

Fox News learned that the complaint was written and filed under the direction of the Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Who is James Boasberg, the American judge at the center of Trump’s expulsion efforts?

“The Ministry of Justice respects this complaint respectfully alleging misconduct by the chief judge of the American district court James E. Boasberg for having made inappropriate public comments on President Donald J. Trump to the Chief of the United States and other federal judges who have undermined the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary,” said Mizelle.

Judge Boasberg presides over a highly publicized case involving the expulsion of several migrants to El Salvador and spoke of holding the MJ lawyers into the outrage because of his assertion that his order to transform airborne planes was not followed. President Trump also made critical comments on Judge Boasberg.

The Ministry of Justice, led by Prosecutor General Pam Bondi, filed an official complaint concerning the judge of the American district court James Boasberg. (Getty Images)

The complaint details two opportunities on which Boasberg judge made comments.

“On March 11, 2025, Judge Boasberg attended a session of the United States judicial conference, which existed to discuss administrative issues such as budgets, security and facilities.” Although his comments were inappropriate even if they had a base, they were even worse because Judge Boasberg had no basis – the Trump administration has always complied with all orders of the court. No Boasberg judge has identified an alleged violation of judicial orders to justify his unprecedented predictions. “

Trump Foe Boasberg orders the Doj to detail the status of Cecot migrants sent to Venezuela

This is the second time that the DOJ of Bondi filed a complaint against a federal judge. (AP photo / Mark Schiefelbein)

“In days From these declarations, Judge Boasberg began to act on his preconceived belief that the Trump administration would not follow judicial orders. First, although he did not have the power to do so, he made a temporary ban order preventing the government from withdrawing the violent terrorists from Tren de Aragua, that the Supreme Court was reported.

“”Overall, the words and acts of Judge Boasberg violate the cannons of the Code of Conduct for the judges of the United States and erode public confidence in judicial neutrality and justify an official investigation. “”

Judge Boasberg orders Rubio to refer signal messages for Trump officials to the Doj to ensure the conservation

The complaint details two opportunities during which Boasberg would have made comments undermining the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary. (Drew Angerer / AFP via Getty Images)

The Doj asks the Srinivasan chief judge to send the complaint to a special investigation committee, as an investigation is essential to determine whether the conduct of Judge Boasberg constitutes “a detrimental conduct for the effective and rapid administration of the courts of the courts”. The complaint also requests that Judge Boasberg be withdrawn from the case involving Venezuelan migrants who were expelled in Salvador, “to prevent a new public erosion while the investigation takes place”.

The case in question is JGG against Trump.

This is the second time that the Doj Bondi filed an official complaint against a federal judge. At the end of February, the DoJ filed a complaint about the American district judge Ana Reyes, concerning what the MJ calls the “fault” of judge Reyes during the procedure of Nicolas Talbott et al. v. Donald J. Trump et al., Which is a case deposited by two LGBTQ groups contesting the executive orders of the Trump administration which prevent transgender individuals from serving in the American army.

The news of the complaint comes at a time when the Trump administration has excited dozens of so-called “militant” judges who have blocked or interrupted some of Trump’s executive orders to take strength in his second mandate in the White House.

Judge Boasberg in particular found himself at the Center for Trump’s anger and at the attacks on the so-called “activist” judges this year, following his temporary prohibition prescription of March 15 who sought to block the use by Trump of the law on extraterrestrial enemies to quickly expel hundreds of Venezuelan nationals in El Salvador.

Boasberg had ordered all planes to El Salvador to be “immediately” returned to American soil, which did not happen.

Who is James Boasberg, the American judge at the center of Trump’s expulsion efforts?

Washington, DC- Judge James E. Boasberg, chief judge of the Federal District Court in DC, means a portrait of the Federal Courte of E. Barrett Prettyman in Washington, DC on March 16, 2023. (Photo of Carolyn Van Houten / The Washington Post via Getty Images) (Washington Post via Getty)

His emergency ordinance approached a complex legal saga which ultimately generated dozens of challenges from the federal courts across the country – although the one who was in court on March 15 was the very first – and then prompted the Supreme Court to govern, on two separate occasions, that precipitating moves had violated the protections of the regular procedure of migrants.

Boasberg, therefore, has become the man at the center of the legal fallout.

Trump administration officials have repeatedly exclaimed Boasberg both for his order and attempt to determine if they have been in good faith to comply with his orders, and Trump himself floated the idea that Boasberg could be dismissed earlier this year – which prompted the chief judge of the Supreme Court John Roberts to issue a rare public warning.

The complaint, focused on behaviors and old -fashioned allegations surrounding the Boasberg judge – first operated as a judge by the president of the time, George W. Bush in 2002, comes at a time when he could again have his say in a case of major collective appeal presented by lawyers representing the former migrants of Cecot.

ACLU and other class members asked Judge Boasberg earlier this month to reopen the discovery in the case, citing allegations of a United Nations report on the status of cotic migrants, and the recent decision to withdraw the 252 migrants from the United States to El Salvador in Venezuela under the exchange of prisons.

Questioned during a status hearing before the court last week if the Ministry of Justice would comply with the orders of the court, the lawyer for the Doj Tiberi Davis said they would do it: “if it were a legal order”.

They also said they would likely request an appeal to a higher court.

In April, judge Boasberg also ruled that the Court had judged that the “probable cause” has the Trump administration in the outrage for having failed to return the planes to the American soil, in accordance with his emergency order of March 15, and said that the court had determined that the Trump administration had shown a “deliberate contempt” for his order.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

The American Court of Appeal for the DC circuit aroused its initial request in April and has not yet moved.