NEWS

The Christian mother challenges the law of the vaccine in California at the Supreme Court for Faith

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A mother of California says that the state forces her to choose between her Christian faith and the education of her son, and she asks the Supreme Court of the United States to intervene.

The emergency request, filed on September 11 and officially accelerated on Friday, was submitted to judge Elena Kagan, who manages the emergency issues of the 9th circuit.

Kagan could decide on herself or refer the case to the full court, a decision that could make the mother’s fight a case of national test on faith and vaccines in a majority conservative bench.

The file, brought by us the Patriots USA, Inc. and “Jane Doe”, argues that the California health code unconstitutionally prohibits its son from frequenting school unless he receives vaccines that she considers religiously reprehensible.

Religious freedom is the central right of America. We must defend it for children and parents

Mandate of the California vaccine of the Supreme Court

A mother of California submitted a file to judge Elena Kagan on behalf of her son who refuses vaccinations on the basis of their Christian faith. (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

DOE maintains that vaccines are linked to abortion by the abandoned fetal fabric used in development and tests and that its faith forces it to keep it pure and pure the body of its Son as “the temple of the Holy Spirit”.

According to the request, his son had attended a public school under an exemption from personal beliefs until California deleted them. When she continued alternative immunization methods, the Ventura Unified school district initially accepted them, to reject them later and prohibit her courses in January.

In May, the prosecutors issued the Criminal Quote of Doe for absenteeism, although the case was abandoned later. Once student at the Crown of Honor, her son now fails academically, according to the file, and struggles socially after being kept from school for months.

The federal judge strikes the minnesota law prohibiting religious colleges of the State Program

The senior woman receives a vaccine

California’s mother, identifying herself as “Jane Doe”, opposes vaccines that use aborted fetal cells on the basis of her Christian faith. (istock)

The lawyers of Doe argue that the law violates the free exercise clause of the first amendment, stressing a recent precedent which recognizes the right of parents to direct the religious education of their children. They argue that California allows medical exemptions that pose the same public health risks as religious exemptions, which makes discriminatory law against people of faith.

“The first amendment does not authorize California to exile the children of the public school because their parents seek to raise them in accordance with their religious beliefs,” said the file.

The brief warns that, without relief, the anonymous adolescent may entirely miss his education or to be forced to choose between “obeying God and sacrificing the future of their children, or yielding to the state and sacrificing their soul and holiness of their children”.

Capitol of the California State

The demonstrators opposed to the mandates of the vaccine meet at the Capitol in Sacramento, California, on September 8, 2021. (AP photo / Rich Petroncelli, file)

Judge Kagan may call for a response from Californian officials or refer the request to the full tribunal for examination. The mother asks the judges to issue an injunction allowing her son to return to school while the wider case takes place in the lower courts.

His lawyers also warn that as that the court intervenes, families like hers may be forced to “literally flee California” to practice their faith, which the memory says that the first amendment was designed to prevent.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

The case comes in the midst of current national debates on vaccine mandates, religious freedom and parental rights under the Trump administration.

The file follows the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Mahmoud v. Taylor, who strengthened the protections for parents who direct the religious education of their children.

Related Articles

Back to top button