The administration of Trump fights the order of the court limiting the application of the ice to the

The Trump administration made a request from the courts to suspend a temporary ban (TRO) prohibition order which was issued on Friday against American immigration and the application of customs (ICE) which ruled that the agency probably violated constitutional protections through its practices of applying immigration to Los Angeles.

In a 53-page prescription issued on Friday, the American district judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, a man named Biden, prevented ice cream from making stops held in the California central district unless the agents have “reasonable suspicions” that a person is in the country illegally.

FRIMPONG’s decision explicitly prohibits the ice to rely only on race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, a location or a type of work during the formation of suspicion, citing the fourth amendment.

In his file on Monday, the Trump administration said that the trial was initially filed by three individual foreigners asking to be released from immigration detention.

The Los Angeles judge weighs serious limits of the application of Trump immigration to California

Several dozen demonstrators stage a demonstration on the bridge of the sixth street between downtown Los Angeles and Boyle Heights protesting against ice deportation operations in Los Angeles on Tuesday, July 1, 2025, in Los Angeles. (Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

“But, apparently seeking to manipulate the process of judicial assignment, the advice of original petitioners then filed a modified complaint adding a multitude of new individual and organizational complainants, relating to systemic challenges to the federal immigration application in the Los Angeles region,” wrote the Trump administration. “And a day later, on the eve of the holidays of July 4, they filed an emergency request ” asking the court to impose a right throat injunction which would considerably restore the government’s ability to stop and have any suspicion of being illegally present in the United States.”

The Trump administration also said that the court had only given them two working days to respond to hundreds of discovery pages.

“The result is a radical injunction at the district level which threatens to initiate the application of legitimate immigration by hanging a sword of damage to each immigration judgment,” said the Trump administration. “The government requires an immediate stay of this untenable order awaiting appeal and an administrative stay in the meantime.”

The Trump administration argued that Frimpong had ignored the recent decision of the Supreme Court involving the president who rejects the universal injunctions – the judge’s decision on Friday was not nationally but was rather focused on Los Angeles and in the California central district.

The Trump Administration is pursuing Los Angeles on sanctuary policies which “hinder” ice operations

The California Highway Patrol uses smoke grenades to advance and repel the demonstrators of Highway 101 during a demonstration following federal immigration operations in Los Angeles on June 8, 2025. (Blake Fagan / AFP via Getty Images)

“An immediate compensation is justified here not only because of the magnitude of the court errors of the Court, but also of their practical consequences for the separation of powers and sovereign prerogatives of the government,” said the file. “It is untenable for a district judge to” restructure operations “of the application of federal immigration and the continuous judicial supervision of an agency normally and correctly, supervised by the executive power.” »»

FRIMPONG chaired an audience Thursday where she planned to grant the request which will have major implications for the application of immigration to California, a state which has become a focal point in the aggressive deportation plans of President Donald Trump.

The judge heard arguments on the advisability of granting Tro against ice for allegations, the agency violated constitutional rights during its immigration arrests.

The federal judge interrupts Trump’s plan to reduce the financing of the States of the sanctuary which refuse to cooperate

A woman signals a Mexican flag among the tear gas of the police during a demonstration in Paramount, California, on Saturday June 7, 2025, after the federal immigration authorities carried out operations. (AP photo / Eric Thayer)

FRIMPONG said during the hearing on Thursday that it was leaned over to grant the TRO on Friday.

“I think it is important that the court is not to charge the application of the law otherwise legitimate,” said the judge.

The case was initially introduced in June as a routine petition of three detainees, but it made its turn in fact a trial that disputes the functioning of the ice.

Friday, the mayor of Los Angeles, Karen Bass, welcomed the decision of the Federal Court to make a temporary ban on prohibition prohibiting what she described as “unconstitutional and reckless raids carried out under the Trump administration”.

She qualified federal actions as aggressive and harmful and reaffirmed of Los Angeles’ commitment to protect the rights of its residents.

Immigration rights groups and local governments, including the cities of Los Angeles, Santa Monica, Culver and West Hollywood, all intervened in the case and the States led by Democrats filed a memory of Amicus in support.

The federal judge orders Trump to return control of the California National Guard to Newsom

The demonstrators compete with the police outside a federal building in downtown Los Angeles for an anti-Trump demonstration “No Kings Day” in a city which was the subject of demonstrations against the immigration raids of Trump on June 14, 2025 in Los Angeles. (Spencer Platt / Getty images)

The complainants allegedly allegedly allegedly allegedly “without discrimination” with the arrest of people with “brown skin” in deposits, car washing, firm and more. Authorities have arrested without “reasonable suspicion” and have sometimes apprehended American citizens in the process, all in violation of the fourth amendment, the lawyers wrote.

The complainants argued that the Trump administration had given ICE an unrealistic quota of 3,000 arrests per day, which made the agents feel in a hurry to explode the legal requirements to make these figures.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration challenges allegations and denies reprehensible acts.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

Lawyers from the Ministry of Justice have written that immigration arrests, including nearly 3,000 in California since early June, have been legally carried out.

Ashley Oliver from Fox News, Bill Melugin, Cameron Arcand, Jasmine Baehr and Stepheny Price contributed to this report.