Immunity in exchange for Epstein’s testimony is not on the table says the surveillance of the house

The chamber’s supervisory committee, led by the president of the GOP, James Comer, said that he will not take into account “a request from the lawyers of Ghislaine Maxwell in search of immunity in exchange for his testimony to the Congress.

The former accomplice and girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein was assigned last week to testify before the prison congress as part of an investigation by the legislators seeking to discover more information on the sexual crimes of the financial in disgrace. An assigned to appear was scheduled for August 11.

Tuesday, Maxwell lawyers sent a letter to President Comer indicating that she would invoke her rights to the fifth amendment and would remain silent before the congress unless an immunity request is agreed.

In Maxwell’s request for immunity, his lawyer offered leniency as a possible solution, indicating that Maxwell “would be willing – and impatient – to testify openly and honestly, in public, before the congress” if it was granted to him.

Epstein Ghislaine Maxwell’s accomplice plays the model inmate as she is looking for a path outside prison

“The supervisory committee will soon respond to Ms. Maxwell’s lawyer, but he will not plan to grant immunity to the Congress for her testimony,” a spokesperson for Fox News Digital said after receiving the letter.

The Chamber’s supervisory committee, led by President James Comer, on the right, said that he would not consider the immunity request from Epstein Ghislaine Maxwell in exchange for his testimony to the congress after the committee assigned him to appear. (Getty Images)

In their letter to Commer, Maxwell lawyers said their client’s testimony could present legal and security risks for their client. Maxwell’s legal team also asked their client questions before his testimony before the Congress, but the surveillance spokesperson did not speak directly about this request.

Another request from Maxwell lawyers was that the deposit date was delayed until the rules of the Supreme Court on Maxwell’s last offer for a call. Monday, Maxwell’s lawyers asked the High Court to hear their client’s appeal during his sentence for sex trafficking in 2021, arguing that the federal government “has the obligation to honor” a 2007 non-pretention agreement which, according to them, should protect it from criminal charges.

The chamber subcommittee voted in favor of the Bill and Hillary Clinton assignment on Ghislaine Maxwell Connection

Ghislaine Maxwell jogs around the FCI Tallahassee track, in Tallahassee, Florida, July 10, 2025. (Matthew Symons for Fox News Digital)

“Ms. Maxwell should never have been charged in the first place. In 2008, the US government promised, in writing, that it would not be prosecuted,” the lawyers of Maxwell wrote in their correspondence to Comer, adding that she did not receive a fair trial when he was sentenced in the south of the New York district for sexual traffic in 2021. ” Epste.

According to lawyers, during the Maxwell case in the South New York district, prosecutors “wrongly convinced the trial judge to unjustly limit Ms. Maxwell to present her defense, and at least one juror lied to an important fact during seeing him to mean the jury.”

A photo composite showing an audience sketch while Ghislaine Maxwell seated at a defense table by listening to testimonies in his sexual abuse trial on December 16, 2021 in New York. (Elizabeth Williams via AP)

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

Fox News Digital contacted Maxwell’s lawyer, David Oscar Markus, to comment, but did not immediately receive an answer.

David Spunt and Julia Bonavita from Fox News contributed to this report.