The GOP of the Senate is launching the first audience on the concealment of alleged cognitive decline Biden
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The Republicans of the Senate are preparing for the first hearing of the large -scale congress in approval cover of the cognitive decline of former president Joe Biden.
Senators John Cornyn, R-Texas., And Eric Schmitt, R-MO. co -chair a Senate legal hearing Wednesday which looks at “what exactly happened” during Biden’s mandate and why the constitutional power to withdraw it from its functions was not triggered.
Cornyn told the Senate that one of the main objectives of the hearing was to highlight what happened behind the scenes during the historical moments of the Biden Presidency “, from the border crisis of Biden to the disastrous results of withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Senators Eric Schmitt, on the left, and John Cornyn launched an audience in the alleged concealment of the drop in health of former president Joe Biden. (Getty)
“And it is now clear that for several months – no one knows exactly how long – the president was simply not up to the task,” he said. “The one who had made these decisions and exercising the functions of the president’s office was not someone who was authorized by the Constitution or by a vote of the American people.”
The audience of Cornyn and Schmitt, announced for the first time at the end of last month, will be held after the release of the book “Original Sin” by the host of CNN Jake Tapper and the journalist of Axios Alex Thompson, who alleges that Biden’s White House tried to control the story of the former president and that his allies worked to cover his decline.
A new book has described the meetings of the cabinet of President Joe Biden as “scripted” and “uncomfortable”. (Paul Morigi / Getty Images for Care Can’t Wait Action)
The hearing, “unfit to serve: how the concealment of Biden has endangered America and undermined the Constitution”, presents a trio of witnesses called by the republican duo of the Senate which served during the first mandate of President Donald Trump and during the years Reagan and Bush.
Among the witnesses of the Republicans are Theodore Wold, who has previously been an interim assistant attorney general to the legal policy at the Ministry of Justice and deputy assistant of the President for internal policy during the Trump administration; Sean Spicer, former press secretary for the White House and communications director; And John Harrison, a legal scholar from the Faculty of Law of the University of Virginia which previously served during the former Reagan and Bush administrations.
Wold and Harrison told Fox News Digital that their testimony would focus on the alleged use of Biden of an autopen, a device that is used to automatically imitate the signature of a person, generally used the signature of many documents, and how the use of the device may have acted as a smoked screen to prevent the trigger for the 25th amendment.
Scoop: GOP Push for a new chamber committee to probe Biden Decline “concealment” wins steam
President Trump called on the Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate the question of whether the team of former president Joe Biden used an automatic and covered the cognitive decline of the former president. (Reuters; AP)
Biden rejected the claims of the legislators and Trump that he usually used an autopen. Trump recently ordered the Attorney General Pam Bondi to open an investigation into the question of whether the employees of the former president “abused the power of presidential signatures thanks to the use of an autopen to hide the cognitive decline of Biden”.
Spicer’s testimony will focus on Trump’s media treatment compared to Biden in their first respective terms and on the way in which certain media would have been “silent” with regard to the signs of the decline of the former president.
Click here to obtain the Fox News app
The Panel Democrats did not call any witness.
The committee’s leading democrat, Senator Dick Durbin, d-ill., Maintained that Cornyn and Schmitt were wasting the time of the panel with their business.
“We have so many important subjects to consider, and it is a completely political company of several of my colleagues,” he said. “It is a waste of the time of the Senate judicial committee.”
