Expert: Democrats distort Trump’s Medicaid reforms in the new bill

Democrats Washington, DC, According to an expert who spoke at the Congress at the Congress, you distort major criticism of the “major bill” of the major bill “of the great bill” with incorrect facts, according to an expert who spoke to Fox News Digital because the Trump budget reconciliation package is debated by the Congress.

“The bill does not reduce the advantages for anyone who has income below the poverty line, anyone who works at least 20 hours per week and does not take care of a child, and American people,” Jim Agresti, president and co -founder of Just Facts said, told Fox News in response to criticisms on the part of democrats and a handful of republicans, including Sen. Josh Greey, that Trump’s bill has cut medicalaid and disprowawatewatewatewatewatewed the poor the poor.

“In other words, this removes illegal immigrants who are not Americans and fraudsters. So this story has no basis in reality. See, what has been happening since the start of the Medicaid? And since time, the poor level of the United States has remained approximate from 11% to 15%. 3% at 29%.

The cups and reform of Medicaid were a Major snack With the Democrats, who have merged data from two new reports from the Budget Office of the Non -Supportance Congress (CBO) to support the allegations that nearly 14 million people lose the coverage. The White House and the Republicans opposed, because all the proposals for the evaluated policy were not in fact included in the legislation of the Republicans, and much less people would in fact be loss of insurance.

How Johnson made another impossible victory with a voting margin only on $ 9.4 billion in expense reduction tickets

Fox News Digital spoke to the facts Jim Agresti Jim Agresti of President Trump’s bill. (Getty / Fox News Digital)

Instead, the Republicans argue that their reforms proposed to implement work requirements, strengthen eligibility controls and repress Medicaid for illegal immigrants preserve the program for those who really need it.

“I agree”, dem. Rep. Jasmine Crockett said in response To a complaint on CNN that the Republicans “want the poor to die” with Medicaid cuts.

Agresti told Fox News Digital that Medicaid cuts are aimed at bringing people out of poverty and waste.

“These are criteria to say:” Hey, if you want, and you are not in poverty, you have to work “,” said Agresti. “You have to do something to improve your situation, what these programs are supposed to be, by releasing people from poverty, without holding them for eternity. So, the idea is to work people, give them an incitement. Hey, if you want to do better in life and you want this drug coverage, then you have to win it.”

Independent senator Bernie Sanders claimed The bill is a “death sentence for the working class” because it increases health insurance “copayments for the poor”.

DEMS “deliberately obscures” the truth about “Big, Beau Bill” with this assertion: Watchdog

Senator Bernie Sanders delivered a response speech to President Trump’s address to a joint session of the congress. (Joe Maher / Getty Images for Fane)

Agresti called this “bizarre” statement.

“First of all, the major bill does not raise copaiaments on anyone who is below the poverty line,” he said. “Now, for people who are above the poverty line, it forces states to invoice at least a kind of copamentation, and this also reduces, in fact, the maximum copament of $ 100 per visit to $ 35 per visit.”

Agresti continued explaining that in the current system, “people essentially have reins to go to a doctor or an emergency room or any other place without any payment, and they are not in poverty.”

“What eventually happens is that they waste a ton of money,” said Agresti. “This has been proven through randomized control tests, which are the gold stallion for the analysis of the social sciences, where you have people in a lottery system, some people benefit from the advantage, and some people do not do it, and what you end up seeing is that people who do not have to have the skin in the game, abuse emergency rooms, they go there for a stifling their health.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Sanders’ communications director Anna Bahr said: “Mr. Agresti’s facts here are simply incorrect.”

The Sanders office added that “almost half of all the registrants on the discussions of the ACA are Republicans” and underlined the bill on the reconciliation of the Chamber that the Sanders office supports “says that if a worker cannot navigate in the labyrinth of documents that the bill creates for the registrants of Medicaid, they are prevented from receiving GOOD.”

“But workers must earn at least $ 15,650 per year to qualify for ACA markets tax credits – approximately equal to annual income for a full -time worker winning the federal minimum wage.”

The Sanders office also underlined “CBO estimates These 16 million people will lose insurance following the bill sentenced to the House and the Republicans ending the tax credits for the improved premiums of the ACA. “”

The Sanders office also reiterated that the bill adopted by the Chamber brought a “fundamental change” to Copay for the beneficiaries of Medicaid, going from optional to compulsory.

“While saying that I am” incorrect “, the staff of” Sanders “do not provide a single fact which shows that the BBB reduces health care to the poor American workers,” said Agresti.

“It is particularly laughable that they cite extended subsidies of Obamacare in this context, because people of poverty are not even eligible to them,” continued Agresti. “After this” temporary “document of the Covid era expires, people with income up to 400% of the federal poverty level – or $ 150,600 for a family of five – will always be eligible for this social protection program, although they will receive less.”

Agresti argued that the complaint of a “maximum copying of $ 35 (for people who are not poor)” hurt the working families “” is not supported by research “which makes generalizations and simply quotes” associations “.” “”

“As secondary mathematics commonly does, the association does not prove causality,” said Agresti.

The Sanders office said to Fox News Digital: “Mr. Agresti seems to believe that a family working at four winnings only $ 32,150 per year deserves help to afford their health care. Health care in the United States is more expensive than all over the world. To finish health care for 16 million Americans and health care costs growing for millions of people will not be more difficult to offer health they need, even if Mr. Agrestes does not agree. “

Agresti also challenged the story that cuts cannot be made in Medicaid without reducing the advantages of the people who are entitled to them.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

The Capitol Building of the National Mall in Washington DC, Friday August 9, 2024. (Aaron Schwartz / Middle East Images / AFP via Getty Images)

“The Government Accountability Office has published figures that are amazing, hundreds of billions of dollars a year will waste,” said Agresti. “So, yes, certain criteria to ensure that this does not happen is a wise idea. Unfortunately, there is a ton of crime in white collar in this country, and this type of crime is a crime in white collar. It is not engaged with a firearm, or by stealing or by hitting someone, it is committed by fraud, and there is a huge amount.

“And the great magnificent bill, once again, seeks to slow down this by putting a criterion to ensure that we check people’s income, we check their assets. Many of these federal programs, government health care programs, they have stopped checking the assets. Thus, you could be a lottery winner on 3 million dollars and you can get very little income. For children for children. “

Hawley said on Monday that he had no problem with some of the Medicaid brand changes that the republican counterparts of the Chamber wanted, including more strict work requirements, the start of illegal immigrants of the roles of services and the rooting of waste, fraud and abuse in the program which serves tens of millions of Americans.

However, he noted that around 1.3 million Missourians rely on Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and argued that most of them were working.

“These are not people sitting, they are working,” he said. “They are on Medicaid because they cannot afford private health insurance, and they do not get it.”

“And I just think it’s wrong to go see these people and say:” Well, you know, we know that you are doing your best, we know that you are working hard, but we will remove your access to health care “”, he continued.

Diana Stancy of Fox News Digital and Alex Miller contributed to this report.