Barrett defends the Supreme Court as a non -partisan institution on Fox News

The judge of the Supreme Court Amy Creey Barrett rejected the partisan representations of the Supreme Court, saying to Bret Bret of Fox News that the judges “wear black, not red or blue” and follow the Constitution, not the policy.

She appeared on Fox to promote her new book, “listen to the law” and to fight against perceptions of the public work and independence of the court.

Barrett stressed that the court is not divided into partisan teams. She also defended her approach to the presidential power, clarified false ideas on the decision of Dobbs and thought about her originalist judicial philosophy.

His book addresses details such as assigned seats, audience traditions and the gap between external perception and inner reality.

Amy CONEY BARRETT details the battle between her own personal opinions and the law in a new book

Judge of the United States Supreme Court, Amy CONEY BARRETT, is seen during the ceremonial performance on the southern lawn of the White House after its confirmation at the Supreme Court in October 2020. (Getty Images)

“You know, we do not wear red and blue, we all wear black because the judges are non-partisans. And the idea is that we are all listening to the law. We all try to do things well. We are not playing for a team,” she told Baier. “We are not sitting on specific sides of the bench, left and right. You know, we sit down in order of seniority.”

Barrett underlined the disconnection between the perception of the public and the interior functioning of the courtyard, noting:

“I often ask the new clerics of the law what surprised you the most when you started? And one of the most common answers is the difference between what is happening inside and what people think is happening inside.”

Judge Barrett opens on the “clumsy” start to Scotus, the shadow file and more in the next memories

President Donald Trump and Amy CONEY BARRETT, associate judge of the United States Supreme Court, stand on a balcony during a ceremony on the South White House lawn in Washington, DC, on Monday, October 26, 2020. (Ken Cedeno / CNP / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Left reviews argue that the court protected former President Donald Trump, a point of view reflected in the points of sale such as the New York Times and NBC.

Barrett responded by placing the work of the court in a historical context, stressing that affairs on the presidential power extend beyond a single occupant of the office.

“We do not decide just cases for today, and we do not decide cases according to the president,” said Barrett. “As a current occupant of the office, we decide on the cases of the presidency. We therefore take each case, and we examine the question of presidential power as is. And the cases that we decide today will have importance.

Judge Barrett defends Jackson Jabs as an apparently rare “justified” public

Judges of the United States Supreme Court pose for their official photo at the Supreme Court of Washington, DC on October 7, 2022 (Olivier Douliery / AFP via Getty Images)

“Four presidencies from now on, six presidencies from now on, etc.

She underlined the rules of the Court on the presidency as an institution, with decisions that resonate between the administrations.

Regarding Dobbs’ decision, Barrett said that the decision had not prohibited abortion but made the question to the political process – a point that it argued had been widely understood.

“Dobbs did not say that abortion is illegal. Dobbs said it belonged to the political process,” said Barrett.

Barrett acknowledged that growing threats to judges, stressing violence should not be “the cost of the public service”.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

Back to the public’s perception, she declared that the court had to follow the law even when decisions are unpopular, stressing the integrity of public opinion.

“The court … cannot take public opinion into account in individual decision-making … You must follow the law where it leads, even if it leads to a place where the majority of people do not want you to go,” she said.