Trump rents a Supreme Court decision blocking universal injunctions

President Donald Trump celebrated after the Supreme Court moved to prevent the lower courts from delivering universal injunctions, which had had an impact on his decrees.

The president held a press conference just over an hour after the decision -making and said that the Supreme Court had arrested a “colossal abuse of power”.

“I have been elected for a historic mandate, but in recent months, we have seen a handful of radical left -wing judges try effectively to cancel the president’s legitimate powers to prevent the American people from obtaining the policies for which they voted in record numbers,” Trump said on Friday.

Due to the decision, the Ministry of Justice “will quickly deposit many policies that have been wrongly hung at nationally,” said Trump.

Scotus reigns over the citizenship order of Trump’s right of birth, testing lower justice powers

President Donald Trump addresses journalists in the Blank House briefing room after the Supreme Court ruled on the Citizenship Citizenship of Rights, June 27, 2025. (Reuters / Ken Cedeno)

Trump also accused judges of the lower courts of having tried to “dictate the law for the whole nation” rather than govern the cases concerning them.

Friday, the judges of the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts to issue injunctions only in limited cases, although the decision leaves the question of how the decision will apply to the citizenship of the right of birth at the heart of the case.

Supreme Court Falade. (Valerie Plesch / Picture Alliance via Getty Images)

The senators seem then that the Supreme Court hears the case on the injunctions on a national scale

The Supreme Court has agreed this year to take a trio of consolidated cases involving so -called universal injunctions transmitted by federal judges of the district of Maryland, Massachusetts and the state of Washington. The judges of these districts had prevented the ban on Trump from the citizenship of the birth law to take strength at the national level – which the Trump administration supported in their call to the Supreme Court was too wide.

The arguments of the Supreme Court in May have little focused on the merits of these universal injunctions – and Friday, the court clearly indicated that it did not judge whether the ordinances of citizenship of birth law were constitutional.

President Donald Trump speaks to the media after the United States Supreme Court has brought a blow to federal judges by restoring their ability to grant a large legal compensation in cases, in the White House press room in Washington DC on June 27, 2025. (Reuters / Ken Cedeno)

Trump distinguished the author of the majority opinion, judge Amy CONEY BARRETT, for having written “brilliantly” and also congratulated the Samuel judges Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas, as well as chief judge John Roberts, for having joined the majority.

“The requests do not increase – and therefore we do not address – the question of whether the decree violated the citizenship clause or the law on nationality,” said judge Amy Condey Barrett, writing for the majority. “The question that is seized is that of appeal: if, under the judicial law of 1789, the federal courts have a fair power to issue universal injunctions.”

“A universal injunction can only be justified as an exercise in fair authority, but the Congress has not granted any federal power,” she added.

Read the decision of the Supreme Court – Application users, click here:

Click for the Fox News app

CONEY BARRETT made Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson a blow, saying that his argument was “in contradiction with more than two centuries from previous, not to mention the Constitution itself. We only observe this: (Jackson) describes an imperial framework while kissing an imperial magistrate”.

In his dissent, Jackson warned that the decision allowed the president to “violate the Constitution” and presented “an existential threat to the rule of law”.