The rules of the Supreme Court on the deportations of the third country of Trump in a highly watched case

The Supreme Court granted the Trump administration on Monday to suspend an injunction of the lower court which prevents them from deporting people to third countries without notice – a short -term victory for the Trump administration while it seeks to quickly apply its immigration repression.

The judges of the High Court ruled 6-3 to suspend the injunction of the lower court, with judges Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissident.

“Rather than allowing our colleagues from the lower courts to manage this dispute on high issues with the care and attention it clearly needs, this court now intervenes to grant the government’s emergency compensation for an order which it has challenged several times,” said judge Sotomayor.

“I cannot join such a raw abuse of the fair discretion of the Court,” she added.

The problem was a group of migrants contesting their moves for third countries or countries that were not their country of origin.

The lawyers of these migrants had urged the Supreme Court earlier this month to leave in place a decision of the American district judge Brian Murphy, who previously ordered the Trump administration to keep in police custody all the migrants provided for expulsion to a country not “explicitly” appointed in their moving orders – known as the deportation name of the third country.

Murphy, a Federal Judge of Boston, presided over a prosecution during migrants who question the deportations to third countries, notably South Sudan, Salvador and other countries, notably Costa Rica, Guatemala and others that the administration would have looked in his wave of deportees in progress.

The Supreme Court allows Trump Admin to go to the end of legal protections for certain Venezuelan migrants

US President Donald Trump speaks to the media after signing decrees in the White House Oval Office in Washington, DC. (SOMODEVILLA / GETTY Images)

Murphy judged that migrants should remain in police custody until they could have the opportunity to conduct a “maintenance of reasonable fear” or the possibility of explaining to American officials any fear of persecution or torture if they are released in the country.

Murphy pointed out that his order does not prohibit Trump “to execute order to return to third countries”. Instead, he stressed in a previous order, “it simply obliges” the government “to comply with the law when he made” such moves under the American Constitution and the wave of moves and deportations of the Trump administration.

By appealing to the affair before the Supreme Court, the US Solicitor D. John Sauer argued that the decision of judge Murphy had prevented them from deleting “some of the worst illegal foreigners”, including a class of migrants sent to South Sudan earlier this year without regular procedure or notice.

He reiterated in a separate order that migrants remain in police custody in a military base in Djibouti until each of them could receive a “reasonable fear interview”, or a chance to explain to American officials any fear of persecution or torture, if they were released in the South-Sudan Guard.

The American judge accuses the administrator of Trump of “manufacturing of chaos” in the deportations of South Sudan, the climbing of the quarrel

The Supreme Court building is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, in this photo of 2024. (AP / J. Scott Applewhite) (AP photo / J. Scott Applewhite, file)

Update of the Supreme Court comes after a wave of disputes of lower lawyers aimed at blocking the repression of Trump’s immigration in his second mandate in the White House.

The American judges have repeatedly ruled that the Trump administration has violated the regular procedure by not making informing migrants of their imminent moves, or offering them any possibility of challenging their deportations before the courts – a reiterated point of view, although in a close manner, by the Supreme Court four times since Trump took office.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

Officials of the White House, on the other hand, exploded so -called “militant” judges as trying to promulgate a political program and repeatedly rejected the idea that illegal immigrants are not entitled to regular procedure.

Until a dozen people from several countries, including Vietnam and Myanmar, were allegedly sentenced to South Sudan – which the lawyers for immigrants previously argued, he was in “clear violation” of the ordinance of judge Murphy.

This is news. Come back for updates.