The American judge appointed by Reagan is one of Trump’s most scathing court criticism

A federal judge appointed by Ronald Reagan made the headlines this year for writing some of the most puffed opinions against the president Donald Trump ‘S orders of S – including in a case where he was criticized by two judges of the Supreme Court for not having respected the high court directives.

US District Judge William Young, a named compared to Reagan, spent nearly four decades on the federal bench. He recently wrote a scathing notice of 161 pages on Tuesday in a case involving Trump’s attempts to deport and repress Pro-Palestinian demonstrators and activists on university campuses.

Young said that the Trump administration’s actions were illegal and an unconstitutional violation of the protections of freedom of expression under the first amendment. He also used the decision to criticize, roughly, the wider driving of Trump, which he described as “intimidation”.

The federal judge launches the frog of Trump’s efforts to expel Pro-Palestinian demonstrators

People pass in front of the Supreme Court on Thursday, June 27, 2024 in Washington, DC (AP photo / Mark Schiefelbein)

Trump, argued Young, is a president who fundamentally mistreated the country he was elected to serve. Young has described Trump as largely focused on the “hollow boastful” and on “remuneration” at all costs.

“However, government’s remuneration for speech (precisely what happened here) is directly prohibited by the first amendment,” joked Young.

This is not the first time that Young has raised the eyebrows for his public resident of the commander -in -chief.

Judges against Trump: here are the main battles of the court prohibiting the agenda of the White House

American district judge William Young at the Boston Federal Justice Palace. (American district court for the Massachusetts / Handout district via Reuters)

In June, in June, judged that the Trump administration had acted illegally when it reduced the financing of research grants to the National Institutes of Health, the defense of subsidies and the order of financing. He also used the opinion to describe the cuts as “terrible” proof of what he said was “racial discrimination” and “discrimination against the LGBTQ community”.

“This is what it is,” said Young at the time, adding that, during his decades on the federal bench, he had “never seen racial discrimination of the government like this”.

“I would be blind not to call him,” he said, adding later, “don’t we have a shame?”

The federal judge blocks the prohibition of citizenship of Trump’s right of birth for all infants, testing lower justice powers

The judges of the Supreme Court of the United States before the state of the Union of President Biden in Washington, DC, on March 7, 2024. (Shawn Thew-Pool / Getty Images)

The Trump administration called on Young’s injunction at the first circuit court of appeal, which refused to suspend the decision while the case continued to play.

However, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 in August to raise the injunction – and two judges took advantage of this opportunity to chastise Young, at least to a certain extent, for the way in which he consulted the opinion.

Judges Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh have reprimanded Young for not having joined an emergency decision granted by the court in April, which enabled Trump to continue with tens of millions of dollars in education subsidies to finance so -called diversity, capital and inclusion initiatives.

“When this court makes a decision, it constitutes a precedent which welcomes respect before the lower courts,” said Gorsuch and Kavanaugh judges in the August opinion.

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, in writing of dissent, seemed to sympathize with Young’s point of view, noting at some point: “Calvinball has only one rule: there are no fixed rules,” she said. “We seem to have two: this one, and this administration still wins.”

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

Young, for his part, apologized for the error. But he seems to have done little to suppress his desire to talk about what he supported on Tuesday is Trump’s apparent contempt for the protections of freedom of expression.

“I fear that President Trump think that the American people are so divided that today, they will not get up, will not fight and defend our most precious constitutional values ​​until they will be rocked to think that their own personal interests are not affected,” said Young on Tuesday, before adding: “Is it reasonable?”