Peter Strzok loses a constitutional challenge on the dismissal of the FBI

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A federal judge rejected the former FBI agent Peter Strzok, the allegations of the termination of the Federal Application Agency for the American Constitution.
Strzok was dismissed during the first term of President Donald Trump.
He sent anti-Trump SMS while investigating the Hurricane of Crossfire on Trump’s campaign and Russia.
The Doj sets up with former FBI officials in the release of anti-Trump texts

Deputy Deputy Director of FBI, Peter Strzok, prepares to testify before a joint hearing of the magistracy and surveillance and reform committees of the government of the Chamber in the Rayburn House Office building on Capitol Hill on July 12, 2018, in Washington, DC (SOMODEVILLA / GETTY Images)
“At this stage, there are only two questions to resolve: did the applicant termination break the first amendment, and did his termination violated the guarantee of the fifth amendment against the deprivation of goods without regular procedure?” A order Signed by judge Amy Berman Jackson explained.
Berman was appointed to the American district court of the Columbia district by President Barack Obama.
The court concluded that “Strzok’s interest in expressing his opinions on the political candidates on his FBI phone at the time was prevailing on the interest of the FBI to avoid the appearance of bias in its in progress surveys on these same people and to protect against the disruption of its operations of application of the law under the direction of Wray, then carried out.”
Trump says that Brennan, Comey “ Croooked as Hell ” in the middle of the FBI survey, may have to “pay the price”

President Donald Trump leaves after having spoke during the 80th session of the UN General Assembly at the United Nations headquarters on September 23, 2025 in New York. (SOMODEVILLA / GETTY Images)
“As for the number of two, the complaint to a regular procedure is based on a false declaration of the facts and the distortion of the chronology,” said the document.
“Once the rhetoric has been exceeded and considers the undisputed factual file, it becomes clear that there is no evidence to support a conclusion that the applicant has concluded a contract … which gave him a real estate interest in his mandate before the deputy director makes his authority exercise to terminate him, or that the applicant lacks notification and an opportunity to be heard before his fate is decided”, note the document.
Patel found thousands of sensitive Trump–Russia probe documents inside the “burn bags” in a secret room at the FBI

Deputy Deputy Director of the FBI, Peter Strzok, testifies to the FBI and the actions of the Ministry of Justice during the 2016 presidential election during a joint committee hearing of the Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on July 12, 2018. (Saul Loeb / AFP via Getty Images)
Click here to obtain the Fox News app
“The complete opinion of the memorandums was laid under the seal”, notes the order, adding that in the point of view of the Court, “nothing in the advice of the memorandum must remain sealed, and, consequently, the parties must inform the court by September 30, 2025 to know if they have an objection to what they believe in the court which must remain under the seal and why.”