The judge blocks the school suspension of the boys who complained of the transgender student in the locker room

First of all on Fox – two boys from Virginia who were suspended after complaining about a transgender classmate in their locker room won emergency reparation before a federal court.

Earlier this year, the District of Public Schools of the County of Loudoun, in northern Virginia, launched an investigation into the sexual harassment of title IX on two boys of secondary age after being recorded on a biological woman who identified as transgender inside the boys’ locker room. The video attracted them externally complaining to each other because there was a girl using their facilities.

This moment led to a title IX survey launched by the Northern Virginia School District in the two boys, who finally found the couple responsible for sexual harassment, a brand that will be placed on their permanent files and suspended them for 10 days.

The parents of the boys and their legal representatives appealed the decision of title IX of the district, but the appeal was refused. The parents then brought their business to the Federal Court. A few days following the file of the Federal Court, a judge subsequently granted parents and their boys an emergency repair, blocking once again the disciplinary repercussions of the district while the case is advancing.

Parents: Virginia Boys suspended after questioning the policy of transgender changing rooms was ignored by the school

A video taken in the locker room of Stone Bridge High School captured two boys complaining about the presence of a biological woman. The two were then suspended for the comments. (Bureau of the Sheriff of the county of Loudoun)

“We are very satisfied with the court’s decision and we look forward to fighting on behalf of our customers,” said Ian Prior, principal advisor to the legal group aligned by Trump, America First Legal (AFL). The AFL joined the Freedoms Freeding Law Center in the case after entering the Federal Court.

One of the boys and their families left the state, but the other is still going to school in the Loudoun County public school system. In the midst of the previous call of title IX of the families of the boys and their legal advisor, the suspension was previously blocked, but it resumed after the refusal of the district of their call last week. However, the suspension has now been suspended again, following the court recovery order of the court.

Judge Leonie Brinkema, of the American district court of the Virginia Oriental District, said in his order that there was enough evidence that the maintenance of a boy suspended for the first 10 days of the school could cause “irreparable damage”.

Virginia’s school district votes to maintain the policy of gender bathrooms, defying the Directive of the Ministry of Education

A case in Virginia is now before a federal court after two boys in the District of public schools in the county of Loudoun were suspended and judged responsible for sexual harassment after having opposed a biological woman, who identified as transgender, using their school changing rooms. (Getty Images / Istock)

“For a court to make a temporary prohibition order, a plaintiff” must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable damage in the absence of preliminary compensation, that the balance of actions in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest “” “The judge wrote in his order.” The loss of 10 days of school in person at the beginning of the school year could have serious negative effects ( applicant), and it appears from the file before the court that (the applicant) had no contact with the student who complained or continued to communicate on this student. Consequently, the court concludes that the balance of actions undergoes prejudice in favor of absence, since (the complainant) is probably an irreparable damage to the absence of constraint for bypass) is probably a prejudice of irreparable to the absence of constraint for the courtes) is probably a prejudice of irreparable to the absence of constraints). notes that the public interest is better served by ensuring that high school students remain at school and receive an adequate process before being suspended. »»

Brinkema added in her decision that she is “not certain” that the complainants will succeed against the substance of their argument, but she admitted that the allegations put forward by the parents and their legal advisor were “disturbing”.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

The AFL and Center for Freedoms Freedoms law trial on behalf of the boys and their parents requires that the “False IX charge” against the two boys for sexual harassment be deleted from their files, an immediate end of the suspension of boys and compensation for “severe emotion, reputation and school damage”.

“It is not only our sons – it is each child of Loudoun. If the district can armed title IX in this way, no family is safe,” said Seth Wolfe, the father of one of the boys. “No parent should have to fear that their child is described as” sex harasse “simply for defending their privacy.”

The District of Public Schools of the county of Loudoun did not immediately respond to a request for comments from Fox News Digital.