Remarks of the speech of Bondi Spargent Torrent of the Critics of the Conservatives

The American prosecutor General Pam Bondi faced a torrent of online criticisms on Tuesday after having suggested in two separate interviews that the Ministry of Justice “would absolutely target” the speech of hatred following the death by Charlie Kirk – provoking an intense reaction of the Republicans and other conservatives and to provoke it to clarify his remarks further.

Bondi tried to fill the gap between her remarks and what she called the hate speech that leads to threats to a long position of social media on Tuesday.

“The speech of hatred which crosses the line in threats of violence is not protected by the first amendment,” said Bondi, citing three American laws which criminalize threats of direct violence, such as threats of kidnapping or injuries. “It’s a crime.”

After the assassination of Kirk, legislators react to the fatal political climate: “violent words precede violent actions”

“For too long, we have watched the radical to normalize threats, call for assassinations and encourage political violence. This era is over,” she said, adding that “freedom of expression protects ideas, debate, even dissent, but it will not protect and never protect violence”.

Bondi’s remarks, made during an interview “The Katie Miller Godcast” and in an interview with Sean Hannity of Fox News during conversations on the deadly Kirk shooting, caused a backlash through the aisle, although it was conservative voices that were the most noisy. Many have noted that Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and subject of interviews, was himself a noisy defender of the protections of freedom of expression under the first amendment, who protects most forms of speech in the United States, including offensive and hateful speech.

Many also seemed to consider the new declaration as insufficient coverage for previous comments of Bondi.

“It is not a correction or a retraction or a retirement; it is a post-hoc attempt to fold the term” hate speech “to signify something he never has,” said Charles Cw Cooke, editor-in-chief of the National Review, on social networks.

The Attorney General Pam Bondi faced a torrent of online criticisms on September 16, 2025, after having suggested in two separate interviews that the Ministry of Justice “would absolutely target” the speech of hatred following the death’s death by Charlie Kirk. (Alex Brandon / The Associated Press)

Almost 24 hours after Bondi’s remarks, criticism continued – almost all Republicans and other notable conservative voices.

Bondi was criticized for the two interviews on Monday, neither distinguishing the type of discourse that threatened the imminent violence of hatred speech.

“There is freedom of expression and then there is a speech of hatred,” said Bondi on Monday in an interview with the former assistant of the Trump administration and animator of Podcast Katie Miller.

. “We will aim for you absolutely, you continue, if you target someone with a speech of hatred,” said Bondi.

In a separate interview on Fox News, Bondi reiterated a similar feeling, suggesting that the government could continue the Office deposit after an employee has refused to print posters with Kirk’s face on them.

She also declared that the ministry “considered” the case of the office deposit in question.

“Companies cannot discriminate,” said Bondi on Fox News. “If you want to enter and print posters with Charlie’s photos on them for a vigil, you must let them do this. We can continue for this.”

“I currently have Harmeet Dhillon in our civil rights unit by examining this immediately, this office deposit had done this,” she said about the employee of the office deposit in question. “We look at him,” she said.

Most of the criticisms that flocked on Tuesday came from Republicans, who noted that Bondi’s remarks are a blatant violation of the protections of freedom of expression guaranteed under the American Constitution.

They are also, some rated, directly in contradiction with the famous views by Kirk.

The GOP broke out on DEM in the course of the prosecutor general in the red state on the post of Charlie Kirk, with blasphemy

Charlie Kirk greets US President Donald Trump at the USA Turning point student action in Washington, DC, July 23, 2019. (Chris Kleponis / Pool via Bloomberg)

“The speech of hatred” is a desperately subjective term, and even if this was not the case, there is no exception of hatred speeches in the first amendment, “said Ed Whelan, a conservative legal expert who was previously committed for the Supreme Court judge Antonin SCALIA.

“I’m sorry, but it’s the kind of leftist progressivism that the conservatives, including Charlie Kirk, are abhorred,” said Erick Erickson on X. “We are holding with Jack Philips, not against him.”

Questioned by Jon Karl of ABC News to respond to Bondi’s remarks on Tuesday, Trump refused to clarify and rather launched the idea of ​​going after the outlet for Karl, although in a joker tone.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

“We will probably go after people like you, because you treat me so unfairly,” said Trump.