Scotus breaks the Way of Ice Raids in California in victory for Trump

The Supreme Court paved the way for the Trump administration to continue to carry out immigration raids in California after the advocacy argued that the federal authorities arrested allegal immigrants alleged without valid reason.

Decision 6-3 of the High Court, issued according to ideological lines, is temporary while the case takes place before the American Court of Appeal for the ninth circuit.

He came after a federal judge in July prevented immigration and the application of customs from carrying out raids in the County of Los Angeles, noting that the complainants would probably succeed in their argument according to which the raids violated the fourth amendment. The ninth circuit confirmed this order, leading the Trump administration to turn to the Supreme Court.

The Court of Appeal denies the request of Trump’s administrator to relaunch the limits of the immigration raids of Los Angeles

A worker is held at the entrance to a field of strawberries to keep the door closed to protect agricultural workers against ice raids on June 12, 2025 in Oxnard, California. (APU Gomes / AFP via Getty Images)

The ordinance of the Supreme Court is a major victory for the Trump administration because it promulgates an aggressive expulsion program across the country. California, one of the four main states of the southern border, has seen high -level demonstrations and riots presenting themselves during the summer in response to ICE raids and the National Guard, which Trump deployed in Los Angeles in June to the objection of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom.

Immigrant rights groups and the unions pursued continued that ice has stopped individuals without reasonable suspicion. The ice authorities presented themselves unconstitutionally on automotive farms and washing and have targeted people according to their race and language, the complainants said.

Trump says that immigration raids on a national scale on the way, rioters to face a “greatest force” than the

The demonstrators protest in front of the federal building of Edward R. Roybal and the metropolitan detention center in response to the ice raids in Los Angeles on Friday June 6, 2025 in Los Angeles. (Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)

The majority of the Supreme Court did not include an explanation, but judge Brett Kavanaugh, one appointed by Trump, offered a concordant opinion in which he declared that the reasonable requirement of suspicion was not a high bar and that the ice could very well have met this bar. A combination of factors, including the race, could provide the authorities with reasonable suspicion to arrest a person and learn about their immigration status, said Kavanaugh.

“To be clear, the apparent ethnic origin cannot provide reasonable suspicions; under the case law of this court concerning immigration judgments, however, it can be a” relevant factor “when considered with other salient factors,” wrote Kavanaugh.

The Ministry of Internal Security celebrated the emergency decision on Monday in a statement, saying that it would not allow the mayor of Los Angeles, Karen Bass, a democrat, to protect illegal immigrants with criminal history.

“A victory for the security of the Californians and the rule of law,” said a spokesperson for the DHS. “The DHS police forces will not be slowed down and will continue to stop and remove the murderers, the rapists, the gang members and other criminals that Karen Bass continues to give the port of Safe.”

The Attorney General Pam Bondi said that in a statement, the ice would now be able to continue “itinerant patrols” without “judicial micro -management”.

The Trump administrator puts an end to the deployment of additional national guard troops in Los Angeles

Judge of the Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor, speaks during a round table at the University of George Washington on March 12, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Jahi Chikwendiu / The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Judge Sonia Sotomayor and appointed by Obama filed a dissent, affirming that the emergency order in light of the raids was “disturbing” because the majority gave no explanation to this decision, which, according to her, was “unconsciously irreconcilable” with the Constitution.

“We must not have to live in a country where the government can seize anyone Latino, speaks Spanish and seems to work at low wages,” wrote Sotomayor.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

The American Civil Liberties Union, one of the groups contesting the Trump administration, said that the high court sanctioned racial profiling.

“For anyone perceived as Latino by an ice agent, it means to live in a scary scheme of” Papers please “, with risks of arrests and violent ice detention,” said Cecillia Wang, national legal director of ACLU, adding that her organization would continue his legal struggle in the ninth circuit.