A solution to two states in Newsom Move would divide the Californian coast from the land

Governor Gavin Newsom drawn Wednesday In a great Republican in California who proposed a “solution to two states” in response to the effort to rediscover democrats in mid-December.

“A person who seeks to divide California does not deserve to hold his duties in the Golden State. It is a blow that will go nowhere,” said Newsom to Nexstar Broadcasting and Fox-40 Reporter Eytan Wallace later Wednesday.

Newsom referred to the Chief of the Minority of the California Assembly, James Gallagher, R-Yuba City, who announced a new bill to divide California into two new states along a North-South line in response to the news of Newsom.

Gallagher’s plan, stated in what will be deposited as AJR-23, would create a new state featuring its liberal coast and another unit of the conservative counties of California.

DEMS wanted to draw every Republican from Maryland, but now the Rocket of Texas Rediscovering

The chief of the minority of the James Gallagher assembly, R-Yuba City, on the left; Gov. Gavin Newsom, right (Getty Images)

Gallagher has nicknamed the movement of a “two -state solution” – a more identified term with territorial clashes in the Middle East – on Newsom’s own clashes with the Republicans, which is the governor’s response to the Rediscovement efforts of Texas.

“Residents of domestic California have been neglected for too long. It is time for a solution to two states,” said Gallagher.

Responding to Newsom after Wallace’s report Gallagher tweeted that he had been “duly elected six times and I assure you that my actions represent exactly what my people feel”.

“We will not allow you to strip representation,” said Gallagher about Newsom.

Gallagher’s resolution responds to the attempt by the Democrats of Sacramento to permanently redraw the cards of the California Congress – an act which, according to him, would silence the rural voices and trace the political system forever.

While the political power of the global terrestrial mass of California would be reduced, the new “interior” in California would be one of the largest states of the country and the right reliably.

Following a series of county lines generally slightly west of the Interstate 5 – which manages the height of 800 miles of the State – the new coastal state would retain many communities in particular left like San Francisco, Oakland, Los Angeles, Silicon Valley and Sonoma.

It would also include the county of Orange on the right relatively central right, as well as the county of San Diego, hence the republican leader of the State Senate is from.

Jones said earlier this month that Newsom was not elected “to play Gerrymandering games to stimulate his presidential campaign, (but) to solve problems here at home.”

Fox News Digital contacted Jones and Newsom to comment.

The original county of Gallagher – Sutter, located north of Sacramento – would fall into the new conservative inner state.

It would also include Truckee on the right – where the Interstate 80 crosses the Sierras – with the county of Kern, where the former president of the Kevin McCarthy Chamber, R -Calif., Is from.

San Bernardino, Riverside and Imperial Counties – which today make up what is called in the same way “the inner empire” – would also fall into the new state.

The 17 coastal counties would together create a state of 29.5 million people while the internal state is home to 10 million, according to the Manteca Bulletin.

Mexican immigrants who have become Congress-Conjoints Blast Dem claim that the Rediscussing of Texas hurts the Latin vote

Texas would become the most populous state in the country, ahead of coastal California by around 1.5 million, while the interior of California would become the 11th most populous state – in Michigan and New Jersey.

Gallagher has castigated what he calls the “capture of mid-decennie” from Newsom as a “mockery of democracy”.

“Do not p-not on my boots and tell me that it is raining. These are rigged cards, drawn in secret to give democratic politicians more power by dismantling the independent commission that the Californians created to keep them out of the card,” he said in a statement earlier this month. His comments came after Newsom approved the Democrats’ plan to place a resolution on the November ballot allowing the State to bypass its semi-independent redistribution council.

“The Californians should choose their representatives, not the other way around,” he said.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

Senator Megan Dahle, R-Bieber, who represents a large band of rural California in the northeast also hosted this decision on Wednesday:

“I have no illusion that this plan to divide California will succeed where the many previous efforts have failed, but I signed as a co-author of this resolution to share the frustration of rural Californians more conservative than their voice is unknown to Sacramento,” Dahle at Fox News Digital told.

“The vote last week by Democrats to carve out the districts of the Congress of the State of the North to try to make GERRY Manner our elected officials out of its functions is only the last glaring example.”

Senator of the State Roger Niello, R-Fair Oaks, launched on Monday an obstacle to the procedure in the redistribution process by indicating in a letter to the secretary of the Senate according to which he would arouse the approval of unanimous consent requests for the legislative session on Tuesday.

“The majority party has written new Congress districts behind closed doors with political agents based in DC to undermine the work of the committee led by California citizens in charge of redistribution,” Niello said in a statement.

In a statement last week, the legislators of the GOP of the State Senate said that “Democratic legislators were also clear on their support for independent redistribution as recently as in July.

But in just a few weeks, a mysterious case of collective (and selective) amnesia seems to have settled. Let’s go back the band and hear them in their own words. “”

Publisher’s note: This story has been updated to reflect that the Republicans of the California Senate published a declaration saying that the Democrats had a “mysterious case of collective amnesia” and that the senator of the State Roger Niello said that he would arouse the approval of unanimous consent.