Zelenskyy refuses that Putin speaks while Trump will push at the meeting of the Alaska summit

Tammy Bruce, the spokesperson for the State Department, told me in an interview that the president was strategically positioned to stop the fights in Ukraine.

“The fact is that the murder must end,” she said on “Media Buzz”. “And if there is someone who can face and manage and manage Putin, it’s Donald Trump.”

Zelenskyy urges direct talks with Putin while Trump establishes a deadline of peace

But what happens if it is Putin who manages Trump? And how can there be a type of regulation when Volodymyr Zelenskyy refuses to participate, saying that the Kremlin dictator tries to deceive America?

Trump addressed this yesterday, at his press conference on the federals who take control of the DC police department – and just say that he wanted to reduce expectations.

President Donald Trump, on the left, and Russian president Vladimir Putin serve his hand at the start of a meeting at the presidential palace in Helsinki, Finland, July 16, 2018. (AP photo / Pablo Martinez Monsivais, file)

One thing that is impossible to ignore is that whenever Trump threatens sanctions against Moscow, he finds a way to avoid following. Remember the deadline for 50 days? And then the deadline for 10 days?

Putin has been diplomatically isolated since her illegal invasion of Ukraine, who presented the deliberate murder of civilians.
By inviting it to Alaska – that America bought in Russia in 1867 and is no longer considered “Seward’s madness” – Trump gives Putin respect as a legitimate world leader, not a pariah.

Putin’s plan has always been to make earnings on the battlefield, then keep all or part of this land in a colony. This is why he continued to bomb Ukraine intensively, killing more civilians, even in the midst of chatting on peace.

Zelenskyy says he cannot give in any land because it would violate the constitution of the country. This would also create a political storm at home. But a recent survey indicates that 38% of Ukrainians are ready to give up a territory to end the war.

Trump explodes Zelenskyy for a constitutional objection to “the exchange of land” in the Ukrainian war

Trump spoke of “the exchange of territories”, but Ukraine has little to exchange. The country took more than 500 square miles during a surprise attack in the Russian region of Kursk, but this has decreased to only four square miles and was at the expense of significant victims.

This could therefore be a rehearsal of what happened when Russia seized Crimea in 2014. The world was indignant, then everything returned to normal.

As for Putin, Trump told journalists yesterday: “I would have an excellent call with him, then the missiles would be launched in kyiv.”
“I’m going to tell him to put an end to this war.”

“I get along with Zelenskyy but I don’t agree with what he did.”

The president said he would try to recover a territory “for the good of Ukraine”.

“Probably in the first two minutes, I will know if an agreement can be concluded.”

Otherwise, “I can leave and say good luck.”

Now you might wonder why Trump gives Putin an audience on American soil without any prior understanding. The president believes in face -to -face negotiations, but it doesn’t always work. For all the love letters between him and Kim Jong-un, North Korea has never moved on its nuclear program.

Trump said about Putin and Zelenskyy, “In the end, I’m going to put them in a room.” Well, maybe.

Even if Zelenskyy goes to Alaska, or a later meeting with Putin, he will not accept to reward Russia for his military aggressiveness, giving land “to the occupier”, as he said. Trump can blame Zelenskyy as the autumn guy, but that does not bring us closer to peace.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

In addition, Zelenskyy naturally wanted security guarantees. Otherwise, Putin could use a ceasefire to allow her forces to rest and recover, then attack again in six months or a year-a replay of the post-cime strategy.
So much to settle the war in 24 hours.

It was a bloody, frustrating and complicated war that led to huge victims for both parties. But all this stems from an illegal invasion by a dictator who insists that Ukraine does not have the right to exist.