The named of Biden fought the “illegal dismissal” while the previous 90 -year -old FTC faces a test

The Supreme Court temporarily authorized President Donald Trump to dismiss many members of the independent agencies appointed by the Democrats, but a case that still travels to the legal system has the greatest implications for the power of a president to do so.

In Slaughter c. Trump, a named member of Biden of the Federal Trade Commission promised to fight what she calls her “illegal dismissal”, setting up a possible scenario in which the affair landed before the Supreme Court.

The case would ask the most direct question to date for the judges of their position on the executor of Humphrey against the United States, the almost centenary decision concerning the power of a president on independent regulatory agencies.

John Shu, an expert in constitutional law that served in the two Bush administrations, told Fox News Digital that he thought that the high court is likely to side with the president if and when the case arrives there.

The Supreme Court said Trump can dismiss CPSC members appointed by Democrats

The Supreme Court was photographed on February 28, 2024, in Washington. (AP photo / Jacquelyn Martin, file)

“I think it is unlikely that Humphrey’s testamentary executor will survive the Supreme Court, at least in its current form,” said Shu, adding that he provided that the historic decision will be canceled or “seriously narrowed”.

What is the executor executor of Humphrey?

Humphrey’s executor was focused on the decision of President Franklin D. Roosevelt to dismiss an FTC commissioner with whom he was in politically disagreement. The case marked the first body of the Supreme Court limiting the dismissal power of a president by judging that Roosevelt has exceeded his authority. The court concluded that the presidents could not reject the commissioners of the FTC without reason, such as embezzlement, before the end of their mandate of seven years, as indicated by the Congress in the FTC Act.

However, the functions of the FTC, which are largely focused on the fight against anti -competitive commercial practices, have developed during the 90 years since the executor of Humphrey.

“The Federal Trade Commission of 1935 is very different from the Federal Trade Commission today,” said Shu.

He noted that today’s FTC can open investigations, issue assignments, bring prosecution, impose financial sanctions and more. The FTC now has executive, quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial functions, said Shu.

Scotus Greenlights Other layoffs

If the Supreme Court’s decision to temporarily authorize two layoffs of the members of the Labor Council is an indication, the High Court is ready to make the FTC less independent and more responsible for Trump.

In an order 6-3, the Supreme Court cited the “considerable executive power” that the National Council for Labor Relations and the Merit Systems Protection Council, affirming that a president “could withdraw without cause of administration which exercises this power in its name”.

Trump’s controversial plan to dismiss federal workers finds the favor of the Supreme Court

The chief judge of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts attended inauguration ceremonies in the rotunda of the American Capitol on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC (SOMODEVILLA / POOL CHIP via Reuters)

The ordinance did not mention the executor of Humphrey, but that and other movements indicate that the Supreme Court was far from the 90 -year decision and is open to reverse it.

The case of Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya is closest to the heart of the executor of Humphrey.

Where is Slaughter?

Slaughter experienced a short -term victory when a federal judge in Washington, DC, noted that Trump had violated the Constitution and ruled in his favor on July 17.

She was able to return to the FTC for a few days, but the Trump administration appealed the decision and, on July 21, the Court of Appeal interrupted the decision of the lower court.

Justice Loren Alikhan had declared in his summary judgment that the case of Slaughter was almost identical to that of William Humphrey.

The Supreme Court confirms the abolition of people appointed by Trump of federal councils

Rebecca Slaughter, commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), during a hearing of the Chamber’s judicial committee in Washington, DC, United States, Thursday, July 13, 2023. (Al Drago / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“This is not the role of this court to decide on the accuracy, prudence or wisdom of the decisions of the Supreme Court-even one since eighty-dix years old,” wrote Alikhan, appointed by Biden. “Whatever the Humphrey executor’s court at the time of this decision, this court will not guess it now.”

The trial was born from Trump licensed Slaughter and Bedoya, the two members appointed democratic of the five members’ commission. They allegedly alleged that Trump had challenged Humphrey’s testamentary by pulling them in March without cause in a letter that “almost word for word” reflected that which Roosevelt sent a century ago.

Bedoya has since resigned, but Slaughter does not recede a legal struggle in which Trump seems to have the upper hand.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

“Like dozens of other federal agencies, the Federal Trade Commission has been protected against presidential policy for almost a century,” Slaughter said in a statement after being released. “I will continue to fight my illegal dismissal and see this case, because part of the reason why the congress has created independent agencies is to ensure transparency and responsibility.”

Now, a panel of three judges comprising two nominees by Obama and one named by Trump envisages a longer -term break and asked that legal files be submitted by July 29, which means that the judges could make their decision shortly after.