NEWS

The administrator of Trump told the court that he could apply the Citizenship Citizenship Order by the end of the month

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Trump administration lawyers told a federal judge on Tuesday that they could start applying the president Donald TrumpThe executive decree ending the citizenship of the right of birth before the end of July – evolving quickly to enforce the controversial order only days after a decision of the historic Supreme Court.

Administration lawyers told US district judge Deborah Boardman that they would not apply Trump’s order before July 27, in recognition of a 30 -day suspension ordered by the Supreme Court in his decision last week.

“The suspension of the court thus allows defendants to immediately start” developing and issuing public directives on the executive’s plans to implement the decree, “said the prosecutor of the Ministry of Justice, Brad Rosenberg in a legal file on Tuesday.

Judges against Trump: here are the main battles of the court prohibiting the agenda of the White House

A divided photo of President Donald Trump and demonstrators demonstrating against Trump's immigration policies. Photos of Getty Images

Lawyers of the Trump administration told court this week that the government plans to enforce the president’s decree ending the citizenship of the right of birth by the end of July. (Getty Images)

The update comes after Trump officials testified to an emergency hearing in Maryland on Monday, where Boardman burned government lawyers for more details on how they plan to apply the president’s order.

Trump’s order, signed on the first day of his second mandate in the White House, orders all American government agencies to refuse to issue citizenship documents to children born of illegal immigrants, or who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen of legal permanent resident.

He was almost immediately blocked by the lower courts, before finally heading towards the Supreme Court, who examined the case in May.

Friday, the 6-3 decision of the High Court was concentrated narrowly on the authority of the ability of the lower courts to issue injunctions on a national level and did not turn into the legality of Trump’s decree, which served as a legal pretext for the case.

In the decision, the judges said that the complainants requesting a national repair should file their affairs as a collective recourse – provoking a wave of action by ACLU, CASA and other defense groups for immigrants who have changed their deposits this weekend.

During the emergency hearing on Monday, Boardman asked for details of the administration.

“Terribly insufficient”: the American judge takes over Trump administration for days deportation information

Building of the Ministry of Justice

The building of the Ministry of Justice is seen in Washington, DC (Ting Shen / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“Just to get to the heart,” she said. “I want to know if the government thinks it can start withdraw children from the United States who are subject to the decree.”

Rosenberg replied in the file that on July 27 “is the first date on which defendants can begin to apply” under the suspension of the Supreme Court.

Lawyers for the Trump administration also stressed that the Supreme Court’s decision last week, which was focused on universal injunctions, did not prevent him from taking other measures before this date, and said that she was planning to “immediately” start to develop and issue public councils on the ordinance.

The High Court’s decision led to a burst of new ACLU proceedings and other immigration defense groups, which have re -examined collective appeals in the federal courts of Maryland and New Hampshire.

The ninth circuit rejects Trump’s attempt to restore the order of droit citizenship

Pam Bondi speaks to journalists

The Attorney General Pam Boni is expressed during a press conference at the headquarters of the Ministry of Justice in Washington, Wednesday, April 16, 2025. (AP photo / Jose Luis Magana)

The ordinance, signed by Trump on his first day of power, was immediately challenged in January by more than 22 American states of the States and the rights of immigrants, which argued that the effort aimed at putting an end to the citizenship of the right of birth was both unconstitutional and “unprecedented”, threatening more than 100 years of legal preceding.

This also triggered deep and inflexible concerns on the part of criticism, which noted that around 150,000 children in the United States were born each year from non-citizens.

The defenders warned that possible repercussions of the order could prove to be “catastrophic”.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

“I think that we have documented in the file is the incredible stress, anxiety and fear that our complainants know because they are not lawyers,” the lawyer for the Casa said on Monday.

“It is confusing for them, and we cannot really assure them that the order is entirely blocked, because it is not the case.”

Related Articles

Back to top button