23 Republican Public Prosecutors Uss EPA to reduce the financing of climatic groups

First on Fox: Nearly two dozen prosecutors of the republican state sent a letter to the head of the Environmental Protection Agency Lee Zeldin On Tuesday, the appellant to cancel the financing of a left -wing environmental group accused of training and lobbying judges on climate policy, Fox News Digital Exclusively learned.

“As a prosecutor general, I refuse to stand up while the tax funds of the Americans finance radical environmental training for judges across the country,” said the prosecutor general of Montana Austin Knudsen told Fox News Digital of its push to encourage EPA to end its financing of the climate judicial project.

“The climate judicial project of the Environment Institute uses Woke climate propaganda, under the guise of what they call” neutral “education, to persuade judges and to push their extremely unpopular program through the judicial system,” he said. “I congratulate President Trump’s efforts to reduce waste and abuse during the first eight months of his presidency, and I am optimistic that his administration will do the right thing and stop funding in Eli.”

Knudsen directed the letter sent Tuesday to Zeldin, which included the signatures of 22 other prosecutors of the Republican State, calling the EPA to chop its funding with the left -wing non -profit organization (CJP) called the Environment Law Institute, which oversees the climate magistracy project (CJP).

The first energy group calls to probe the “national campaign of national law” secret to influence the judges on the climate

The prosecutor general of Montana, Knudsen, led a letter sent to the head of the EPA Lee Zeldin on August 26, 2025, calling the EPA to end its funding at the Environmental Law Institute. (Getty Images)

The Environment Law Institute founded the climatic judicial project in 2018, which presents itself as a “primary effort of its gender” which “provides judges with authoritarian, objective and reliable education on climate science, the impacts of climate change and the way in which climate sciences occur in law.”

The group, however, was accused of having tried to manipulate the judges to make them more temporary to the climatic litigation on the left.

The letter sent on Tuesday called the EPA specifically to put an end to the subsidies and the awards with the group.

“We write to bring to your attention subsidies granted by EPA to the Institute of Environmental Law (‘Eli’),” said the letter. “According to its 2024 financial statements, ELI received approximately 13% of its income in 2023 and 8.4% in 2024, EPA prices. ELI also supposed to receive funds from the federal government; its financial state has warned that the collection of federal grant funds) is subject to federal shares or federal actions.”.

Climate Group scrubs judges the names of the website after the cats found.

The Institute of Environmental Law received $ 637,591 from the EPA in 2024 and $ 866,402 in 2023 of the EPA, according to non-profit tax documents published by Propublica detailing the group’s federal expenses that year.

“The mission of the climate judicial project is clear: the judges of the lobby to develop a policy of climate change through the courts,” wrote 23 prosecutors general in the letter. “A magazine profile of former students said that the calm part aloud, writing that the co-founder of the climate judicial project was” explaining the science of climate change in a group of people with a real power to act on this subject: the judges “. Falsification of the climate judicial project raises serious legal and ethical questions.”

The EPA administrator office, Lee Zeldin, received a letter on August 26, 2025 by 23 prosecutors of the state calling EPA to end funding at the Institute of Environment Law and to its climate judicial project. (Al Drago)

The Institute of Environmental Law, however, in a recent comment to Fox News Digital, argued that its educational programs by the climate judicial project comply with standards established by national judicial training establishments.

The educational events of the climate judicial project are carried out “in partnership with the main national judicial training establishments and the state judicial authorities, in accordance with their accepted standards,” said a spokesperson for the group in a statement sent by email in July. “His study program is based on facts and first of all in science, anchored in consensus reports and developed with a process of examination by robust peers which meets the highest learned standards.”

“The work of the CJP is no different from that of other continuing judicial training organizations which approach significant complex subjects, including medicine, technology and neuroscience,” said a spokesperson for the Institute of Environmental Law at Fox News Digital when they asked them about its educational programs.

The appeal to EPA to write funds at the Institute of Environment Law was celebrated by leading groups such as the American Energy Institute and the Alliance for Consumers, which deplored a comment to Fox Digital that taxpayers’ funds should not be used to finance the group and that “the courtroom” threatens daily life.

“State prosecutors are right to call for the elimination of taxpayers’ financing for the Institute of Environment Law and its climate judicial project,” said Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, Fox Digital. “This is a coordinated campaign to advance the new green contract thanks to the judiciary by using so -called climate disputes in the courts. Its study program is developed by the climatic alarmists of the complainants and awarded to the judges behind closed doors. Public funds should never be used to finance the political advocacy released as a legal education.”

Oh Skinner, the Executive Director of the Alliance for Consumers, which is a non -profit organization focused on advocacy on behalf of American consumers, noted that “as we have warned for a long time, the left has a plan to reshape American society by using prosecution in the courts of all the country, in particular in places like Hawaii and other coastal enclaves.”

“The new wave of revelations about Eli is more concerning the evidence of how the left is to impose compulsory progressive lifestyle thanks to this maneuver in the courtroom and what a great threat it is really for all our lifestyles,” added Skinner.

A climate demonstrator changes the Wilson building as part of a gathering of the Earth Day against fossil fuels on April 22, 2022. (Getty Images)

Climate Lawfare Campaign treated Blow in South Carolina

The Tuesday letter specifically argued: “State protection laws prohibit deception and misleading declarations to market a product. ELI represents its training as objective when the reality shows that this is not the case. State prosecutors are responsible for consumer protection, and we are concerned about ELI’s declarations.”

The EPA brought an ax to millions of dollars provided under the Biden administration to left -wing groups and other programs considered to be a waste of taxpayers on the confirmation of the Zeldin Senate as EPA chief in January.

The EPA under the Trump administration has canceled $ 20 billion in grants under the law on inflation reduction – which led to an ongoing legal battle. Zeldin said in March that the $ 20 billion dollars in American taxes were “stationed in an external financial institution in a deliberate effort to limit government surveillance, distributing your money by only eight passes, politically connected, unskilled and, in some cases, new NGOs.”

The State Attorney General thought about the previous cuts of their call to Zeldin to do the same for ELI funding.

“Under the bold direction of President Trump, federal agencies and the government’s Ministry of Efficiency enabled $ 190 billion, including more than 15,000 subsidies which saved around $ 44 billion,” said the letter. “You have respected the directive of President Trump and achieved monumental savings for taxpayers. You have canceled $ 20 billion in climatic subsidies under the inflation reduction law. You have canceled another 1.7 billion dollars in diversity, capital and inclusion subsidies.

The China’s climate law is expected to raise the Bondi microscope, says Kansas Ag

The judicial project of the climate and the Institute of Environment Law have already been criticized by legislators such as the Republican Senator of Texas Ted Cruz, who accused groups of working to “train judges” and “make them pleasant to the creative tactics of climate litigation”.

Click here to obtain the Fox News app

The Texas Republican recently argued that there was a “systematic campaign” launched by the Chinese Communist Party and leftist American activists to arm the judicial systems to “undermine the domination of American energy”.

The climatic judicial project is a pivotal player in the “law” as it works to guarantee “judicial capture”, according to Cruz, Fox Digital previously reported.